Delhi Firecracker Prohibition: Law vs. Customs

Understanding the impact of fireworks on the planet and public health during festivals

The employment of firecrackers symbolizes an ongoing fight between tradition and modernity during festive events in our culture. Firecrackers, with their piercing cracks and bright bursts of light, have long been a component of many cultural events, lending a sense of spectacle, joy, and auspiciousness. But as the negative effects of these fireworks on the environment and public health become more widely known, especially in highly populated urban areas, the long-standing custom must either adapt or go.

The controversy around the prohibition of firecrackers has erupted in several nations recently, raising issues related to environmental sustainability, public health and safety, and cultural preservation. One of the most notable examples of this debate is seen in India, where a lavish fireworks show is customary for the annual Diwali celebration, also known as the celebration of Lights. The mythological and traditional event has come under increasing criticism from environmentalists, health experts, and concerned residents who highlight the harmful effects of air pollution, noise pollution, and health risks brought on by the widespread usage of firecrackers.

The debate continues, posing difficult problems concerning the relationship between individual rights, collective duty, and cultural heritage. This article examines the many facets of the firecracker ban dispute, including the rationale for the prohibitions, their effects on cultural customs, and the wider environmental and public health ramifications. We hope to shed light on the delicate balance between the past and the future, between beloved practices and the urgent need for a more sustainable world, by analyzing this changing terrain.

History of this custom

The customs and traditions surrounding the lighting of firecrackers on Diwali offer insight into a multifaceted cultural landscape with deep roots in India's past. This practice has centuries-old roots, which attest to the close relationships between spirituality, mythology, and the collective festival celebrations.

One of the most enduring stories connected to Diwali is the story of Lord Vishnu's seventh avatar, Shri Ram, as told in the epic Ramayana. Following a successful 14-year banishment and a victorious conflict with the demon king Ravana, Lord Rama, his spouse Sita, and obedient sibling Lakshman made their way back to Ayodhya. Ecstatic to welcome this miraculous return, the inhabitants of Ayodhya lighted oil lamps, lighting up the city. They also let off firecrackers, which produced dazzling flashes of light and sound over the night sky. In addition to being a way for them to show their happiness, this gesture represented the triumph of good over evil, the return of dharma (righteousness), and light over darkness.

Another interesting story associated with Diwali is the victory of Lord Krishna over the world-terrifying demon king Narakasur. Legend has it that Lord Krishna defeated Narakasur and put an end to his despotism. People rejoiced greatly after this victory, setting off firecrackers and generally having a good time to show their satisfaction and relief.

These customs from the past highlight the firecrackers' profound spiritual and mythical roots in Diwali. Firecrackers have traditionally been associated with celebrations of the victory of good over evil, the return of heavenly entities to their homes, and the removal of ignorance and darkness from one's life. Over the ages, this custom has changed, and firecrackers now play a crucial role in Diwali celebrations as a sign of happiness, optimism, and the community that unites people on this auspicious occasion.

Customs and traditions as legal sources

Traditions and conventions are important sources of legislation in India, especially when it comes to family and personal affairs. A varied range of customs and traditions that have been passed down through the decades make up the nation's unique cultural fabric. These customs frequently have a significant influence on private laws that deal with matters like inheritance, marriage, and religious rites. For example, Hindu personal laws govern marriage, divorce, and succession and are firmly ingrained in Hindu traditions, having been impacted by ancient conventions and practices.

Similarly, Islamic traditions and conventions serve as the basis for Muslim personal rules, which regulate many facets of family and personal life within the Muslim community. By recognizing these customary rules, India recognizes the nation's cultural heterogeneity and diversity and permits people to follow their customs in these particular regions.

On the other hand, there may be situations in India where public policy or established legal standards conflict with customs and traditions. Some customs, such as child marriage, dowries, and sati, have been outlawed and made illegal because they are harmful to people or violate their rights. Despite having their roots in long-standing conventions, these actions are illegal and are thought to violate the ideals of gender equality and human rights.

To protect the values of justice, equality, and the welfare of its residents, the Indian legal system supersedes customs in certain situations. This illustrates how, within India's developing legal system, maintaining cultural traditions must be balanced with the need to safeguard individual rights and the general welfare.

Requirements for a custom or tradition to be enacted into legislation

For a custom to be recognized by law and enforced, it usually has to fulfill several requirements. These requirements may change based on the jurisdiction and legal system, but generally speaking, the following components are thought to be crucial:

Old Age and Uniformity: The tradition ought to have been adhered to continuously for a considerable amount of time, proving its age and persistence. Customs that have been followed for a long period without a significant deviation are more likely to be accepted by courts and legal authorities.

Reasonable Certainty: The tradition ought to be clearly stated and recognized in the community in which it is followed. It must lay out in detail how it functions and what is expected of participants or persons.

Against public policy: A tradition shouldn't go against accepted legal precedent, morality, or public policy. It shouldn't be harmful, violate someone's rights, or encourage illicit activity. We shall not recognize customs that are at odds with basic legal principles.

Reasonable Acceptance: A sizable percentage of the community or group to which the custom applies should accept it. An essential component of its acknowledgment is its widespread acceptance in the pertinent community.

Continuous Usage: The custom shouldn't have been abandoned or significantly changed over time; rather, it should have been followed continuously. Traditions that have become extinct or have changed dramatically might not be recognized.

Conformity with Statute Law: Statutory law and customs shouldn't be at odds. When there is a contradiction, statutory law usually prevails. Legal statutes that conflict with customary practices might not be recognized or upheld.

Lack of Arbitrariness: The tradition shouldn't be capricious or arbitrary. It ought to make sense and have a valid reason for being in the community or group that it is applied to.

Law vs Custom

Despite their deeply ingrained cultural significance, there have been cases in India where specific customs or traditions have been outlawed or restricted by legislation because they are harmful or discriminatory. These judicial actions seek to preserve individual liberties, advance social fairness, and safeguard constitutional values.

 Fundamental rights vs customs and the law

The prohibition on the use of firecrackers on holidays such as Diwali has sparked discussions and legal challenges since it may violate fundamental rights protected by the Indian Constitution. Although public health and environmental protection are the main drivers behind the prohibition, other fundamental rights are also at play.

Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25): The Indian Constitution recognizes the freedom of religion as one of the basic rights. The freedom to freely practice, profess, and spread one's religion is guaranteed by Article 25. Some contend that since firecrackers are symbolic of religion and culture on occasions like Diwali, prohibiting their use would violate their right to do so. Indian courts, however, have consistently decided that this right is not unqualified and that it may be subject to reasonable limitations for the sake of morality, public health, and public order. Courts have acknowledged that the general benefit of society should be taken into consideration while balancing the right to religious freedom.

Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21): The Indian Constitution's Article 21 guarantees both of these rights. Firecracker-related air pollution can have detrimental effects on one's health and even violate one's right to personal freedom and health. Courts have upheld prohibitions on actions that endanger life and well-being and emphasized the significance of protecting public health.

Article 14: The right to equality guarantees that every person is treated equally in front of the law. Some contend that a ban on firecrackers unnecessarily singles out particular cultural customs, which could be interpreted as discriminatory. However, to pass the "reasonable classification" test, the government and courts frequently argue that these prohibitions are required to safeguard the environment or the public's health, among other legitimate public interests.

Article 19(1)(a): Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression One way to interpret the prohibition on firecrackers is as a limitation on the freedom of speech and expression. During festivals, firecrackers are frequently employed as a means of expression and joy. Nonetheless, Indian courts have ruled that this freedom may be subject to reasonable limitations to safeguard public health and order, which includes limiting air pollution and noise.

The Indian legal system acknowledges that fundamental rights are susceptible to reasonable constraints and are not inalienable. Courts have frequently upheld the prohibition on firecrackers on certain occasions, like Diwali, when health and environmental issues are especially pressing. When it comes to matters like firecracker bans, the Indian legal system must delicately strike a balance between the rights of the individual and the larger good of society. Usually, courts determine if the limitations are appropriate, necessary, and reasonable to further a justifiable public interest.

In summary

The Diwali ban on firecrackers exposes a convoluted legal dynamic where customs collide with laws. Even though firecrackers are a significant component of Diwali festivities, the legislation acknowledges the importance of the public interest, especially when it comes to environmental and public health issues.

The legal system recognizes that reasonable limitations may be placed on fundamental rights, such as the freedom to practice one's religion when doing so serves the interests of the environment, public health, and public order. Bans on firecrackers are thus put into place to strike a balance between personal traditions and more general societal and environmental obligations.long-standing custom must either adapt or go.

The controversy around the prohibition of firecrackers has erupted in several nations recently, raising issues related to environmental sustainability, public health and safety, and cultural preservation. One of the most notable examples of this debate is seen in India, where a lavish fireworks show is customary for the annual Diwali celebration, also known as the celebration of Lights. The mythological and traditional event has come under increasing criticism from environmentalists, health experts, and concerned residents who highlight the harmful effects of air pollution, noise pollution, and health risks brought on by the widespread usage of firecrackers.

The debate continues, posing difficult problems concerning the relationship between individual rights, collective duty, and cultural heritage. This article examines the many facets of the firecracker ban dispute, including the rationale for the prohibitions, their effects on cultural customs, and the wider environmental and public health ramifications. We hope to shed light on the delicate balance between the past and the future, between beloved practices and the urgent need for a more sustainable world, by analyzing this changing terrain.

plagrism - delhi firecracker.pdf

Download PDF • 28KB